Amazon Behavioral Interview Questions (+ 48-Hour Checklist)
Amazon behavioral interviews are explicitly anchored to the Leadership Principles (LPs). Expect deep follow-ups ("Tell me more," "What was the trade-off?"). Your stories need metrics, constraints, and teachable moments.
Most candidates stumble not on the story, but on thin details. Prepare 6–8 STAR stories with at least two layers of depth (data, alternatives considered, risks).
In the loop, a Bar Raiser acts as an independent interviewer who focuses on long-term hiring bar and LP fit. Don't fear this interview—prepare to defend decisions and trade-offs crisply.
TL;DR
- Amazon behavioral interviews are explicitly anchored to the Leadership Principles (LPs). Expect deep follow-ups ("Tell me more," "What was the trade-off?"). Your stories need metrics, constraints, and teachable moments.
- Most candidates stumble not on the story, but on thin details. Prepare 6–8 STAR stories with at least two layers of depth (data, alternatives considered, risks).
- In the loop, a Bar Raiser acts as an independent interviewer who focuses on long-term hiring bar and LP fit. Don't fear this interview—prepare to defend decisions and trade-offs crisply.
- Short on time? Use the 48-hour checklist at the end to compress prep without sounding canned.
SwiftPrep difference: paste your job link → we auto-map likely LPs and rounds for that specific team and role, then generate a 48-hour plan you can execute.
What Amazon Actually Evaluates
Amazon publishes its LPs publicly—and interviewers are trained to probe for them. Expect targeted exploration of Ownership, Bias for Action, Dive Deep, Earn Trust, and others, with probing questions to validate that the impact and thought process were yours (not "the team's").
The interview format varies by role, but most onsite interview loops include multiple one-on-ones assessing different dimensions. The Bar Raiser provides an independent read on both bar and LP alignment.
Translate this to preparation:
- Depth over breadth. One great, metric-rich story beats three vague ones.
- Trade-offs. Always explain the alternatives you rejected and why.
- Learning loop. Close with what changed in your behavior afterward.
The Leadership Principles (and what to show)
Amazon lists 16 Leadership Principles. You won't be asked one per LP; instead, expect 3–5 LPs prioritized for your role/team. Show impact with numbers, customers, or business goals.
LP focus | What interviewers seek | Proof points to prep |
---|---|---|
Customer Obsession | You anchored decisions on customer outcomes, not convenience | Customer metric moved (NPS, latency, adoption), real user quotes |
Ownership | You acted beyond your lane and owned the result end-to-end | Cross-team coordination, on-call or incident leadership, post-mortem actions |
Dive Deep | You went several layers down, not just surface metrics | Query/analysis, tracing, A/B, logs—specifics, not "we investigated" |
Bias for Action | You shipped with constraints and managed risk | Small-batch release, guardrails, rollback plan |
Earn Trust | You handled conflict transparently and raised standards | Disagree-and-commit moments, direct feedback examples |
Invent & Simplify | You removed complexity and created leverage | Deleted code/process, lower cost, clearer system |
Are Right, A Lot | Judgment under ambiguity + correction of wrong calls | Decision framework + a time you changed your mind |
Hire & Develop the Best | You raised the bar for people around you | Mentoring outcomes, hiring signals, promotion results |
Question Bank (with answer patterns)
Below are realistic prompts you might encounter, with guidance on how to answer like a builder—not a blogger.
1) "Tell me about a time you owned a problem end-to-end." (Ownership)
Pattern that works:
- S: Specific, gnarly problem with a clear customer impact.
- T: Your explicit responsibility ("No one owned X; I took it").
- A: Concrete actions (who you pulled in, artifacts, checkpoints).
- R: Metric movement and what persisted after (runbooks, alerts).
Anti-pattern: "We as a team…" with no verifiable you-shaped impact.
2) "Describe a decision you made with incomplete data." (Are Right, A Lot)
Pattern:
- Present options and why you chose one (expected value, risk).
- Show what falsifiable signal would've made you switch.
- Include post-decision audit: did it hold up? What changed?
3) "A senior stakeholder disagreed with your plan. What did you do?" (Earn Trust / Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit)
Pattern:
- Separate principle from personalities.
- Show how you verified assumptions together (small test, data).
- End with alignment—even if not your preferred path—and a result.
4) "When did you move fast and accept the risk?" (Bias for Action)
Pattern:
- Define the risk envelope (blast radius, feature flags).
- Show speed with safety valves (rollback, dark launch).
- "We shipped in 3 days, 0 incidents, +12% CTR."
5) "Walk me through a time you simplified something complex." (Invent & Simplify)
Pattern:
- Baseline complexity cost (on-call hours, infra cost, lead time).
- The before/after: fewer steps, less code, faster outcomes.
- Add a small diagram if relevant in your notes.
6) "Give an example where you had to Dive Deep to find root cause." (Dive Deep)
Pattern:
- Name the signals you traced (logs, traces, SQL, dashboards).
- The "aha" moment should be specific (a mis-indexed table, a leaky retry).
- Show the permanent fix, not just the band-aid.
7) "Tell me about your biggest professional failure." (Learn & Be Curious / Ownership)
Pattern:
- A real failure with real stakes.
- What you did wrong, not "the organization."
- The mechanism you installed so it won't repeat.
Heuristic: if your answer has no numbers, it's not ready.
How Interviewers Score You (and where candidates lose points)
From Amazon's own hiring resources: the loop structure aims to get a well-rounded read on your skills; Bar Raisers focus on the long-term bar and LP fit. You're expected to speak to impact and mechanisms, not just intent.
Common gaps:
- Vague ownership: "We decided…" with unclear leadership moments.
- No trade-offs: "We picked Kafka" (why not SQS? why now? what cost?)
- Unmeasured outcomes: "It went well" (how do we know?)
- No learning loop: story ends at release, not at impact or follow-up.
What strong candidates do:
- Treat every story like a mini-case: context → options → choice → result → learning.
- Bring artifacts: metrics snapshot, rollout plan, post-mortem bullets.
- Offer push-button depth: "We saw p95 drop from 480ms → 210ms; we traded +$600/mo in compute for +5% conversion."
48-Hour Sprint Plan (realistic & focused)
If your interview is in two days, here's a time-boxed plan that preserves quality.
Day 1 (AM) — Story inventory (90–120 min)
- List 8 high-impact projects/incidents. Tag each with likely LPs for your role.
- Pick your top 6 stories. For each, write 5 bullets: metric baseline, constraints, options considered, decision, result.
Day 1 (PM) — Rehearsal with depth (90 min)
- For each story, prepare two layers of follow-ups: "How did you know?", "What if X failed?", "What did you try second?"
- Record one practice answer. Cut filler and tighten to 2–3 minutes per story.
Day 2 (AM) — Gaps & "failure" story (60–90 min)
- Draft a genuine failure story with Mechanism Installed afterward.
- Prepare 3 good questions per interviewer (team goals, metrics, "what will success look like in 6 months?").
Day 2 (PM) — Dry run + logistics (45–60 min)
- 30-minute mock loop (partner or solo).
- Prep space: quiet room, stable net, notebook of metrics and examples.
SwiftPrep can auto-generate this plan from your job link, aligning LP emphasis to the team's stack and remit.
FAQs
How many Leadership Principles are there? Amazon uses 16 Leadership Principles; they're public and central to interviews. Read them and anchor your stories to the relevant ones.
What is a Bar Raiser? Do they have veto power? A Bar Raiser is an independent interviewer trained to maintain Amazon's hiring bar across teams and to assess LP alignment and long-term potential. Their role is to ensure the bar goes up over time; treat it as a rigorous, fair interview focused on principles and evidence.
What does the interview loop look like? You'll meet several interviewers, each assessing different areas (e.g., LPs, problem-solving, role-specific skills). Think of it as a multi-angle read on your fit and impact.
Printable Checklist
- 6 STAR stories w/ metrics, constraints, trade-offs
- 1 genuine failure story + mechanism installed
- LP mapping per story (primary, secondary)
- A/B/C alternatives for at least 3 decisions
- Three thoughtful questions to ask each interviewer
- Artifacts ready (diagram, dashboard, rollout plan bullets)
If You Only Remember One Thing
Show your mechanism. Amazon interviewers want to see the system you used to make the decision—and that it survives scrutiny. Depth wins.
Try SwiftPrep
Paste your job link and we'll:
- detect team, role, and likely LP emphasis
- assemble a 48-hour behavioral plan
- surface role-specific sample questions and red-flag follow-ups
Ready to ace your Amazon behavioral interview? Start your personalized prep plan today.